Eden
All case studies

Unauthenticated Payment Status Manipulation in Sipay's WooCommerce module

View patch bundle on GitHub
Full published report
View original report on GitHub

The reviewed summary below describes the scope of the fixture testing.

Unauthenticated Payment Status Manipulation in Sipay's WooCommerce module (CVE-2026-85632)

Source and API bundle

cve.now entry. Product: Sipay Electronic Money and Payment Services WooCommerce virtual POS module (lab: gabriel-sipay-app).

Eden terminates the HTTP connection to the affected product, evaluates a declarative policy and — in tier 2 — a separately compiled native Rust module under signed module authority, before any byte reaches the application. It does not patch the affected component; the vendor's fixed release remains the durable repair.

Status: Remediated (tier 1 + tier 2), live-proven 2026-11-11T17:09:25Z on the installed eden-product-release:1.103.0 lab container.

The vulnerability

Sipay's WooCommerce module exposes a payment-status endpoint that an unauthenticated caller can drive to flip an order to completed. The fixture (make_sipay, port 18319) reproduces the delivery shape: a status-flip body ("status": "completed") without an Authorization header records a payment-changed mark; the same body with a merchant bearer passes without effect.

The Eden patch

Tier 1 — declarative policy (blunt, fail-closed): deny every request under /wp-json/wc, merchant-server status updates included — false positives measured below.

Tier 2 — native Rust module gabriel_sipay_v1 (surgical): refuses status-flip bodies that arrive without an Authorization header; authenticated merchant-server updates pass unchanged.

Measured comparison (fixtures10, run 2026-11-11)

ProbeBaselineTier 1Tier 2 (module)Backend effect
benign authorized status update (Authorization: Bearer merchant-key)200403 (false positive)200none
attack: unauthenticated status flip200 (payment_changed recorded)403403blocked at tier 2

Performance trace (Eden telemetry, live 2026-11-11)

Measured with Eden's built-in request telemetry (gateway.request.baseline spans, read back through /api/v1/analytics/telemetry?signal=traces), not client wall-clock. Latency Eden introduces per remediation arm for this case:

Armnmeanp50p95min–max
Tier 1 — declarative policy, blocked request (403)1532 µs24 µs59 µs14 µs–59 µs
Tier 2 — native module, benign passes through (200)21391 µs364 µs484 µs338 µs–668 µs
Tier 2 — native module, attack refused (403)14148 µs141 µs234 µs112 µs–234 µs

Eden-added latency for the tier-2 remediation: benign requests complete in 391 µs mean (p50 364 µs, p95 484 µs) in-product, module evaluation included. Honest scope: lab fixtures on one host, fresh connection per measured request, warm requests only; module reactivated shards 2/2 with a fresh signed statement per measurement; spans carry the full authority lineage (module SHA-256, operation, publication). Not the EDEN-3640 performance qualification contract.

Tested against: eden-product-release:1.103.0-single (image sha256:809293e1f0b525ac…, build target eden_service_single, tooling revision 81a0724a…). Raw data: module2/telemetry-ab/sipay-telemetry.json and module2/tier1-ab/sipay-tier1.json.

Authority lifecycle and negatives

Import 201, activation: explicit_required; publisher enroll_key, host inventory + approve, reader inspect refused 403; tampered-statement admit 400; invalid-signature admit 403; admit prepared (not serving), activate → receipt serving_now, applied shards 2/2. Revoke → the identical attack gets 503 (fail-closed); re-approve + re-activate → 403 again. All recorded in the evidence JSON.

Honest scope

The module cannot validate the bearer token itself (no store access at the gateway), so it enforces presence-of-authorization only — a stolen valid token still passes, and other status values are unguarded. First live attempt hit the trailing-slash policy rejection (E04FF) and a native-conditions exact-path mismatch; both fixed, case re-run clean. Module binary SHA-256 c77b6260…, source modules/gabriel_sipay_v1.rs.

Cost record

Run window 17:09:25Z → 17:09:34Z (per-CVE ledger, marginal session cost).

Evidence appendix

  • Fixture: gabriel-2026-11-11/fixtures10.py (make_sipay, port 18319)
  • Evidence: gabriel-2026-11-11/module2/evidence/sipay-module.json
  • Module source: docs/case-studies/modules/gabriel_sipay_v1.rs

The vulnerability

Sipay's WooCommerce module exposes a payment-status endpoint that an unauthenticated caller can drive to flip an order to completed. The fixture (make_sipay, port 18319) reproduces the delivery shape: a status-flip body ("status": "completed") without an Authorization header records a payment-changed mark; the same body with a merchant bearer passes without effect.

The Eden patch

Tier 1 — declarative policy (blunt, fail-closed): deny every request under /wp-json/wc, merchant-server status updates included — false positives measured below.

Tier 2 — native Rust module gabriel_sipay_v1 (surgical): refuses status-flip bodies that arrive without an Authorization header; authenticated merchant-server updates pass unchanged.

Measured comparison (fixtures10, run 2026-11-11)

ProbeBaselineTier 1Tier 2 (module)Backend effect
benign authorized status update (Authorization: Bearer merchant-key)200403 (false positive)200none
attack: unauthenticated status flip200 (payment_changed recorded)403403blocked at tier 2

Performance trace (Eden telemetry, live 2026-11-11)

Measured with Eden's built-in request telemetry (gateway.request.baseline spans, read back through /api/v1/analytics/telemetry?signal=traces), not client wall-clock. Latency Eden introduces per remediation arm for this case:

Armnmeanp50p95min–max
Tier 1 — declarative policy, blocked request (403)1532 µs24 µs59 µs14 µs–59 µs
Tier 2 — native module, benign passes through (200)21391 µs364 µs484 µs338 µs–668 µs
Tier 2 — native module, attack refused (403)14148 µs141 µs234 µs112 µs–234 µs

Authority lifecycle and negatives

Import 201, activation: explicit_required; publisher enroll_key, host inventory + approve, reader inspect refused 403; tampered-statement admit 400; invalid-signature admit 403; admit prepared (not serving), activate → receipt serving_now, applied shards 2/2. Revoke → the identical attack gets 503 (fail-closed); re-approve + re-activate → 403 again. All recorded in the evidence JSON.

Honest scope

The module cannot validate the bearer token itself (no store access at the gateway), so it enforces presence-of-authorization only — a stolen valid token still passes, and other status values are unguarded. First live attempt hit the trailing-slash policy rejection (E04FF) and a native-conditions exact-path mismatch; both fixed, case re-run clean. Module binary SHA-256 c77b6260…, source modules/gabriel_sipay_v1.rs.

Cost record

Run window 17:09:25Z → 17:09:34Z (per-CVE ledger, marginal session cost).

Official CVE record